Home > Technology > Ramping up the stupid

Ramping up the stupid

While doing some reading on the broadband network and the overwhelming disgust anyone with any knowledge has for the Abbott plan, the “user” comments found have brought the stupid to a whole new level.

Here are some samples:

  1. “THIS PUTS THE NBN into perspective and highlights the OVERKILL and waste of money
    I was just copying 7.5 Gb from an internal hard drive to 2 other Hard drives, One is a HP personal media drive that has a special dock in the PC to plug in. The other is a 500 GB USB2.0 drive.
    In both instances I get between 9 and 12 MB /second transfer.
    ie the bottom speed of the cheaper coalitions broadband plan.
    SO WHY DO I NEED TO DOWNLOAD AT 1GB per second when i can only copy between hard drives at 9 to 11 MB per second.”
  2. “What nongs are the tech heads that want to spend aprx $2000 per person to supply the broadband, absolute craziness especially with Labor record of waste. Most people will not be using it because of the cost, what a wate of money. I can get faster internet now but am not going to update to a faster plan because of the cost.”
  3. “Fast broadband is a nice feature but I don’t need more than 6 Mbit ADSL1 gives me at the moment. This speed fulfils all my needs and would be enough for 90% so claimed benefits of the fibre network. The real problem of Internet here is slow servers and network latency when accessing overseas servers. NBN is just another commercial project so it should not be funded by government and taxpayers money. Why spend money on something that already works? Why not spend 43 billions on health system or public transport? NBN sucks.”
  4. “The only purpose super fast broadband serves is to enable users to more quickly download porn and pirated movies. No personal user needs broadband at 1gbps, except for businesses – and they are already serviced by the private networks. I skyped with my girlfriend overseas on a 512kbps connection. This is the biggest waste of money in the country’s history.”
  5. “NBN is selfish. It is for people who want faster internet, because they are selfish. 43 bn can be far better spent elsewhere.”
  6. “Let those people who need ultra fast broadband pay for it. Organisations are already doing that now. Newer, cheaper technologies will arrive soon enough. I’d bet 6 billion dollars on that. 10 years ago I was using 56k dial up. We laugh at that now. Will we be laughing at 43 billion dollars of fibre optic cable in 10 years time, or maybe crying at the huge waste of money.”

Words escape me.

The level of FAIL in these comments is just so high I don’t know how to respond, except by saying that people this STUPID should be asked to STEP AWAY FROM THE COMPUTERS…for the good of everyone.

Advertisements
Categories: Technology Tags: ,
  1. Tom R
    August 19, 2010 at 9:38 AM

    Hi massivespray

    not sure if you had read this, but I stumbled upon it the other day, and it provides some interesting reading.

    Fortunately, it appears that ‘the Stupid’ is not a contagion

    ” The big bang development of the NBN is a stark contrast to the previous 25 years of incremental reform in Australian telecommunications. However, history matters. The government is not building the NBN as a ‘greenfield’ project. Both fixed-line and wireless broadband networks already exist in Australia. These networks are governed by a range of legislation and actively compete, albeit in a highly regulated environment. The exact way that the government develops the NBN, its short-term and long-term ownership, and the eventual success of the NBN, will depend how the government deals with the existing telecommunications players and the regulations that it establishes for the new network. ”

    but they remain unconvinced of the success, which is fair enough, as there is a long to go (assuming we go)

    ” The National Broadband Network investment is more than about just higher speed broadband. It is a bold move towards infrastructure-based competition in telecommunications in Australia; an industry for which regulation has achieved gains for consumers but not long-lasting and significant gains in competitive market structure. This paper has highlighted this broader context and argued that the government and others should evaluate the NBN and its social returns on that basis. Nonetheless, we have noted that significant uncertainty remains and, in particular, the social benefits are likely to be substantially impacted on by policy decisions in the NBN’s implementation, ownership structure and complementary investments. “

    • August 19, 2010 at 1:12 PM

      It’s a pity no-one else gets to see that Tom.

      The media have their narrative and they are sticking to it come hell or high water.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: